Setting Priorities|Comparative Risk Report

SETTING PRIORITIES|Comparative Risk Report

Project Name: Washington Environment 2010

    Ranking Results:

Public Advisory Committee Ranking of Environmental Threats
Human Health Risk Rankings
Ecological Risk Rankings

    Project Description:

Geographical Coverage

Project Purpose

Ranking Process

Participants in the Ranking Process

Project Reference

Contact Information

    More:

Help with Interpreting these Rankings

Suggest Links to Online Information

Join an Online Discussion

Ranking Results

Public Advisory Committee Ranking of Environmental Threats
	Priority Level 1	Online Information About This Issue
	Ambient air pollution	general	area specific
	Nonpoint source discharges to water	general	area specific
	Point source discharges to water	general	area specific
	Priority Level 2
	Drinking water contamination	general
	Nonchemical impacts on agricultural lands	general
	Nonchemical impacts on forest lands	general
	Uncontrolled hazardous waste sites	general	area specific
	Wetlands loss/degradation	general	area specific
	Priority Level 3
	Global warming and ozone depletion	general	area specific
	Hydrologic disruptions	general	area specific
	Indoor air pollution	general
	Nonchemical impacts on recreational lands
	Nonhazardous waste sites	general	area specific
	Pesticides (i.e. not covered elsewhere)
	Regulated hazardous waste sites	general	area specific
	Priority Level 4
	Acid deposition	general	area specific
	Indoor radon	general	area specific
	Nonchemical impacts on range lands	general
	Radioactive releases	general
	Sudden and accidental releases	general	area specific
	Priority Level 5
	Litter
	Materials storage		area specific
	Nonionizing radiation	general

[ top ]

Human Health Risk Rankings
		High	Online Information About This Issue
	1.	Ambient air pollution	general	area specific
	2.	Indoor air pollution	general
		Medium High
	3.	Inactive hazardous waste sites	general	area specific
	4.	Point-source water pollution	general	area specific
	5.	Drinking water contamination	general
	6.	Nonpoint-source water pollution	general	area specific
		Medium
	7.	Pesticides
	8.	Indoor radon	general	area specific
	9.	Nonhazardous waste sites	general	area specific
	10.	Active hazardous waste sites	general	area specific
	11.	Accidental releases	general	area specific
	12.	Materials storage		area specific
		Lower
	13.	Global warming/ozone depletion	general	area specific
	14.	Radioactive releases	general
	15.	Nonionizing radiation	general
	16.	Litter

[ top ]

Ecological Risk Rankings
		High	Online Information About This Issue
	1.	Point-source water pollution	general	area specific
	2.	Nonpoint-source water pollution	general	area specific
	3.	Hydrologic disruptions	general	area specific
	4.	Wetlands loss/degradation	general	area specific
	5.	Impacts on forest lands	general
		Medium
	6.	Impacts on recreation lands
	7.	Accidental releases	general	area specific
	8.	Inactive hazardous waste sites	general	area specific
	9.	Ambient air pollution	general	area specific
	10.	Impacts on agricultural lands	general
	11.	Global warming/ozone depletion	general	area specific
	12.	Impacts on range lands	general
	13.	Pesticides
	14.	Acid deposition	general	area specific
	15.	Active hazardous waste sites	general	area specific
	16.	Nonhazardous waste sites	general	area specific
		Lower
	17.	Radioactive releases	general
	18.	Materials storage		area specific
	19.	Litter
	20.	Nonionizing radiation	general

[ top ]

Project Description

	Geographical Coverage: State of Washington
[ top ]

	Project Purpose: Washington Environment 2010 is an effort to build a broad-based vision for the future of the state's resources and to formulate an action plan to build that future. The State of the Environment Report provides the foundation for such planning by presenting a picture of the current status of environmental resources, significant continuing or emerging threats or risks to continues enjoyment of those resources, and future projections given some of the current identifiable trends. Presentation of this picture is intended to inform the ensuing public discussions of the desired future for Washington's environment, the actions necessary to ensure the desired future is created, and the priority of those actions.
[ top ]

	Ranking Process: In addition to compiling six resource characterization reports, the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) constructed two consensus rankings: Human Health Risk and Ecological Risk. Concurrent with the TAC research, an outside consultant completed an economic damages report and a committee of state agency staff completed a risk "controllability" report for risk management purposes. The Public Advisory Committee produced the final comparative ranking of risk management priorities, taking into consideration the Technical Advisory Committee reports and rankings, the economic damage estimates, the risk "controllability" reports, and individual member's judgment and expertise.
[ top ]

	Participants in the Ranking Process: General Public Governmental Agencies Private Sector/Industry Public Interest/Nonprofit Organizations Scientific/Academic Community All of the above stakeholder groups, with the exception of the General Public, had at least one representative on the Steering Committee, Pubic Advisory Committee, or Technical Advisory Committee. The General Public were involved through a series of 12 public meetings.
[ top ]

	Reference: Washington Environment 2010. The State of the Environment Report: Volume 1 Introduction and Overview. Washington Department of Ecology. October 1989. Washington Environment 2010. Toward 2010: An Environmental Action Agenda. Washington Department of Ecology. July 1990. Washington Environment 2010 Technical Advisory Committee. Transmittal of Technical Advisory Human Health and Ecological Risk Rankings to the Washington Environment 2010 Steering Committee and Public Advisory Committee (PAC) Washington Department of Ecology. August 1989. Note: This memo, while part of the public record, was never published so as to not diminish the relevance and importance of the final comparative ranking of risk management priorities by the PAC.
[ top ]

	Contact Information: Dee Ragsdale Washington Department of Ecology PO Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504 phone: (360) 407-6986 fax: (360) 407-6989 http://www.wa.gov/ecology/
[ top ]